Bandai Namco Under Fire: Is Tekken 8’s Future in Jeopardy?

The Tekken community recently found itself engulfed in controversy as Bandai Namco faced mounting criticism over several high-profile incidents. These events raised important questions about the company’s commitment to its player base and the future of the beloved franchise. With players expressing their frustrations and concerns, the latest developments have prompted a closer examination of the implications for Tekken 8 and its long-term success. As the dust settles, the community is left to ponder the direction Bandai Namco will take moving forward.

A Case of Negligence: The Disqualification of an 18-Year-Old Chinese Player

It’s hard to imagine the heartbreak an 18-year-old Chinese Tekken player Xiao Chen (XCC) must have felt, disqualified just one match before Top 8 winners—one of the most coveted positions in any tournament. After booking a flight, paying for a hotel, and covering his registration fees, and finally traveling to Thailand from China for Thaiger Uppercut 2024, his journey was abruptly cut short. The reason? He resides in China, a country currently under U.S. sanctions, and thus not eligible to participate in the Tekken World Tour (TWT), a series bound by U.S. laws. (See current sanctions on China)

pic.twitter.com/0IPIUA2qra

— Bandai Namco Esports (@BNEesports) October 6, 2024

What makes this situation worse is how easily it could have been prevented. When registering for the TWT, players are asked for their region and country, a key checkpoint that should have flagged his eligibility. Unfortunately, this didn’t happen. The fact that the player was able to bypass several layers of checks—from Start.GG’s registration platform to Bandai Namco’s eSports team—exposes a glaring oversight in the system.

Bandai Namco’s eSports division, in particular, must bear the brunt of the blame here. As a major entity with resources and experience, they should have ensured a more robust system for vetting participants. While Start.GG simply serves as the platform, Bandai Namco has the responsibility to prevent such mishaps from occurring.

This disqualification also highlights a larger issue within the Fighting Game Community (FGC): the role of politics and bureaucracy in eSports. In recent months, we’ve seen more and more examples of these outside forces impacting the scene, raising the question—has eSports, in its current form, become more of a hindrance than a benefit to the FGC? Grassroots tournaments would never face this level of bureaucratic red tape, allowing the focus to remain on the players and competition, rather than geopolitical regulations.

For the player, this wasn’t just a logistical failure—it was emotionally devastating. To work your way through the bracket, only to be disqualified at such a critical moment, is both demoralizing and traumatizing. Competing at a high level is already an anxiety-inducing experience, but to have your efforts nullified by a preventable issue is a nightmare no player should face.

Monetization Missteps: Tekken 8 Faced Community Backlash

Bandai Namco found itself under scrutiny last week over its decision to charge players $5 for a new stage in Tekken 8, especially after the previous beach stage had been available for free. The inconsistency was puzzling, particularly since this new stage was a remaster from Tekken 7; it seemed reasonable to assume that retooling existing content wouldn’t require a hefty price tag. Given the limited content in the season pass, adding a new stage should have been a straightforward decision.

Harada’s statement on the matter offered some context, explaining that the Tekken project was divided between a development studio and a publisher responsible for sales. While this division helped streamline game development, it also meant that decisions about pricing and monetization fell outside Harada’s direct control. He acknowledged that this structure led to oversight regarding community feedback and that he had failed to address player concerns effectively. However, recognizing the problem was just the first step; the real challenge lay in implementing meaningful change.

The timing of the backlash could not have been worse. Following the addition of Heihachi to the roster, Tekken 8’s Steam page began experiencing review bombing, a trend that only intensified with the disqualification of Chinese player Xiao Chen. Players were particularly incensed about Xiao Chen’s DQ, a sentiment echoed across the community. While casual gamers may not have been deeply invested in the competitive scene, they certainly felt the sting of the lackluster season pass content. This dissatisfaction transcended player types—from casual consumers to hardcore enthusiasts and professional players alike.

Tekken 8 review bombed for the 2nd time in 5 days. This review bomb has double the negative reviews of the 1st incident. https://t.co/Wpgs3TVKfK pic.twitter.com/OkfL7plFND

— Moonsault Slayer (@VolSkimmer) October 6, 2024

Furthermore, Harada’s decision to delete his apology tweet only compounded the issue, signaling a lack of transparency and accountability. In a time when building goodwill with the community was crucial, such actions were seen as a step backward, further alienating players who were already frustrated.

The cumulative effect of these incidents posed a significant threat to Tekken 8’s long-term viability. In contrast to Tekken 7, which enjoyed a lengthy lifespan due to goodwill, consistent updates, and regular content drops, Tekken 8 risked falling into a pit of disappointment. If Bandai Namco continued on this current path, it would likely find that the community’s patience was wearing thin, jeopardizing the future success of this beloved franchise.

About Author